Read Sady Doyle’s diatribe against “nice guy” Brett Kavanaugh: because he is anti-abortion, that means he’s anti-women, right? Wrong!
Brett Kavanaugh Is Nice. That Doesn’t Mean He’s Not Sexist.
We’ve confused “sexism” with meanness — and sexists routinely benefit from our confusion
A “woman’s right to choose” was never intended to extend to the right to end another human’s life, but that is exactly what the Pro-Choice movement took from Roe v. Wade. In a staggering over-reach of Judicial power the Supreme Court extended the constitutional right to privacy to allow a woman to have an abortion. “The court declared that a woman’s right to an abortion was implicit in the right to privacy protected by the 14th Amendment.” The 14th Amendment was intended to guarantee citizenship to former slaves: specifically “all persons born or naturalized in the United States…are citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside.” It appears that the legalists of the Supreme Court took the view that because the baby hadn’t been born yet, it is not yet a citizen and therefore has no rights, not even the right to life, so there is nothing to stop its own mother having it murdered. That ruling should have been over-turned by the Federal Government: it goes way beyond interpreting existing Law and crosses well into the Law-making that rightfully belongs with the US Congress and Senate.
Norma McCorvey the woman who was the Jane Roe in Roe v. Wade is now herself a Pro-Life advocate: By Sady Doyle’s twisted logic that makes her “Sexist” too! The language used by the Pro-Choice movement is slippery stuff: “A woman’s right to choose” sounds so obviously right: Only a sexist would deny a woman’s right to control her own body, right? That means she has the right to not get pregnant, either through chastity or through the use of contraceptives. So far so good: denying a woman the right to control her own fertility, once the technology exists to do so would be sexist.
Once she has become pregnant though, two lives are at stake. You can only agree that allowing an abortionist to rip apart an unborn child is OK if you dehumanise the unborn child: Pro-Choicers always refer to it only as a fetus or a zygote, never as a baby: they know the power of words to disguise the truth, and make murder into an acceptable “termination” of an unwanted embryo!
If a pregnant woman is murdered, the killer is charged with two deaths: the woman herself, and her unborn child. You only need to know the grief of the mother of a still-born child to know that the unborn child is indeed a child, a little human being. To use weasel words to deny this is to lie, purely to disguise the unacceptable murder of another human being as a medical procedure, just another form of birth-control.
What about the unborn child’s right to life? Unless the mother’s life is at risk by continuing the pregnancy (in which case the baby must be sacrificed to save her life) there is no justification to taking its life. And to those who say this is sexist, what if that baby is a girl?
You cannot equate Pro-life with Sexism: they are two different things!
In closing, who else in history used weasel words to dehumanise a class of people so that killing them would not be murder, just a necessary cleansing?
That would be Karl Marx labelling some humans as “Capitalists” and therefore expendable, standing in the way of the Socialist egalitarian paradise, or it would be Adolf Hitler, labelling some humans as “Jews” and therefore expendable, standing in the way of the Aryan Third Reich paradise.
Like the purges of Capitalist under Communism, and the Holocaust of the Jews under Nazism, one day History will see the slaughter of the unborn under Feminism as just as evil.
Your right to choice stops when it impinges on another human’s right to life and freedom. That why I don’t have the right to choose to kill someone and take all their money, for instance. Would I be laughed out of court if I justified the murder by saying it was my right to choose to be rich? Yes, and rightly so.
Only the lie that an unborn child is not a baby makes its murder acceptable to society, and this is the Big Lie that has been told so often by the Left that Progressives believe it as sacred writ. It is not sexist to stand up for the rights of the unborn child: Pro-lifers are women at least as often as they are men.